The idea of democracy rests on the principle of representation of governments formed “by the people, for the people, and of the people.” In a truly democratic society, elected leaders are expected to reflect the collective aspirations of their constituents, to protect their rights, and to act as the voice of the voiceless. However, in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K), the ground reality paints a much more complex and troubling picture. The people of this politically and emotionally charged region have long questioned: is this democracy or just a carefully staged drama? For decades, political representation in J&K has been marred by a combination of conflict, manipulation, proxy interests, bureaucratic control, and disillusionment. While elections do take place and governments are formed, many argue that the institutions of governance here often function in a vacuum distant from the will and needs of the people they claim to serve. Since 1947, Jammu & Kashmir has had a unique and troubled relationship with the Indian state. Unlike other princely states, J&K’s accession to India was conditional, under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which granted the region a special autonomous status. Over the decades, however, this autonomy was gradually eroded through a series of legal and political maneuvers. From the dismissal of elected governments to the imposition of President’s Rule multiple times, the political history of J&K reads more like a cycle of central control and local betrayal than a healthy democracy. The controversial 1987 elections, widely believed to have been rigged, marked a turning point in Kashmiri politics, leading to a decades-long insurgency fueled by widespread alienation and mistrust. Many still believe that had democracy been allowed to function honestly at that time, the Valley’s tragic history could have taken a different turn. J&K has seen participation in elections ranging from very low to moderately high voter turnout, depending on the region and time. While in many places, people do cast votes, especially in Jammu and parts of Kashmir and Ladakh, the meaning of those votes remains questionable. Several factors dilute the integrity of political representation:
Selective Empowerment: Power in J&K has often remained limited to a few political families and dynasties the Abdullahs, the Muftis, and a few others. This concentration of power often leaves the common people without a real choice, leading to voter fatigue and apathy.
Role Of Security Apparatus: With J&K being one of the most militarized zones in the world, elections have often taken place under heavy security presence. This undermines the sense of free political expression and choice.
Boycotts And Disenfranchisement: Major political groups and civil society have often called for election boycotts, citing lack of credibility and central interference. A significant portion of the population, especially in Kashmir Valley, feels that their participation legitimizes a system that does not represent them.
Post-2019 A Turning Point or a Final Nail ? The abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of J&K into two Union Territories in August 2019 marked a seismic shift in the region’s political landscape. While the central government claimed it was a historic correction aimed at integration and development, many Kashmiris saw it as a betrayal and a demolition of their identity and political agency.Post-2019, the region has been governed directly by the Centre through the Lieutenant Governor. Local political leaders were jailed or put under house arrest for months. The legislative assembly was dissolved, and elections have not been held since then. The promise of restoration of statehood and elections remains unfulfilled even in 2025, making the region effectively disenfranchised. This vacuum in local political representation has left people at the mercy of bureaucrats and appointed officials, who neither understand nor reflect the ground realities. Grievances go unheard, and developmental promises often remain just that promises.
“The cultural, linguistic, and religious identity of the people in Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh must be protected. The local population seeks genuine political representation that goes beyond scripted narratives. True democracy requires active citizen participation, open dialogue, accountability, and mutual respect. Residents question the authenticity of their democratic experience and seek to be acknowledged, valued, and heard for meaningful political representation in the region”.
Rise Of Alternative Voices, Real Change or Cosmetic Adjustments? In the absence of traditional political leadership, the Centre has tried to promote new political players so-called “mainstream alternatives” who often lack grassroots legitimacy. These players are seen by many as mere puppets, brought in to give a democratic façade to an undemocratic setup.Simultaneously, civil society groups, students, activists, and even independent candidates have tried to fill the vacuum by speaking truth to power. However, these voices are often silenced through surveillance, detentions, or legal harassment under laws like the Public Safety Act (PSA) or the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).
Media And Representation A Gagged Fourth Pillar: A vibrant democracy thrives on a free and fearless press. In J&K, the media operates under intense scrutiny. Journalists face frequent arrests, internet shutdowns, and harassment. Newspapers struggle with censorship and withdrawal of government advertisements. Independent journalism, which could have played a role in strengthening democratic values, is now on life support. This controlled media environment contributes to the illusion of normalcy and democratic function while hiding the systemic suppression of dissent and the people’s voices.
The Human Cost of Political Disempowerment, Behind the statistics and political jargon lies a human tragedy of people struggling with everyday challenges, yet feeling powerless to influence change. Unemployment remains high, development is sluggish, and corruption is rampant. Youth, once hopeful for jobs and peace, now face a future filled with anxiety and hopelessness. With no credible platform to raise their voices or seek accountability, many have become disillusioned. This disillusionment is dangerous it fuels alienation and creates fertile ground for radicalization, resentment, and unrest.
Can True Democracy Be Restored? While the current state of political representation in J&K appears grim, hope is not entirely lost.Holding assembly elections is the first and most essential step. These must be genuinely free from central interference, with credible international and national observers if necessary.People must be given back their political dignity by restoring statehood a promise made multiple times by the government itself.Political leaders, civil society, and the youth must be engaged in dialogue to rebuild trust. Draconian laws should be repealed or reviewed to ensure that civil liberties are respected and Grassroots governance, through empowered Panchayats and local bodies, must be strengthened. People should have a say in how their local schools, hospitals, and roads are managed. Democracy must not mean cultural assimilation. The distinct cultural, linguistic, and religious identity of the people of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh must be safeguarded and in the theater of politics in Jammu & Kashmir, the people are tired of watching a drama scripted elsewhere, acted out by unchosen characters, and ending in the same tragedy over and over again. Democracy here must move from being a scripted performance to a genuine platform of the people’s will. Representation must mean more than voting once every five years. It must mean participation, dialogue, accountability, and respect. Until that day comes, the people of Jammu & Kashmir will continue to ask the painful question — is this really democracy or just a drama being played in their name? True democracy begins not with the ballot box, but when every citizen feels seen, heard, and valued.” Let this be the standard by which we measure political representation in Jammu & Kashmir.
(The author a freelancer is a lawyer by profession. The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author and aren’t necessarily in accord with the views of “Kashmir Horizon”)
Advocate Sajad Paul
[email protected]
