On 2nd January 2025, Omar led UT administration of J&K hold first press interaction in Srinagar and deliberated on various issues. This press interaction has a great significance to understand UT model of governance and how it can work for peoples welfare if only personal, political and party centric agendas are kept aside. Here is my take. The political landscape of Jammu and Kashmir has always been complex, shaped by historical, geopolitical, and socio-economic factors. Since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, the Union Territory (UT) model of governance has been the focus of intense scrutiny. With the return of elected leadership under Omar Abdullah, who addressed the press on January 2, 2025, the region stands at a crucial juncture. His remarks about navigating the delicate balance of governance in a UT directly connected to the Central Government underline the unique challenges—and opportunities—this governance model presents. Since 2019, the NDA-led Central Government has overseen J&K’s governance, claiming substantial developmental progress. Infrastructure projects, improved connectivity, and increased investments are often cited as achievements. Yet, public opinion remains divided. Some argue that the UT model has fast-tracked development and enhanced administrative efficiency, while others believe the centralized approach has marginalized local voices and failed to address the region’s nuanced needs. This divergence of opinion highlights a fundamental truth: governance is not just about physical development but also about earning the trust and confidence of the people. As Omar Abdullah’s government begins its tenure, it has an opportunity to bridge this gap by fostering an environment of mutual respect and cooperation with the Centre. The UT model of governance offers both advantages and challenges. On one hand, it allows for greater administrative control and streamlined decision-making, particularly in regions with strategic importance like J&K. On the other hand, it risks alienating local stakeholders if not implemented with sensitivity. Omar’s acknowledgment of the “understanding phase of UT model of governance” reflects the need to strike a delicate balance. His administration must work closely with the Centre to ensure that the unique identity, culture, and aspirations of the people of J&K are not overshadowed by national priorities. The key lies in open communication and a shared vision that prioritizes the welfare of the people above all else.
“By focusing on people-centric policies and ensuring that development reaches every corner of J&K, the Centre can reinforce the viability of the UT model as governance in J&K. As J&K embarks on this new chapter, it is imperative that both leaderships rise above political differences to focus on what truly matters: the welfare of the people. If this balance is achieved, the UT model of governance can indeed prove to be better than the state model, setting a benchmark for other regions across India.”
To realize that the UT model of governance can be better than the state model of governance is to accept all demands of the Omar-led government that align with the region’s welfare and strike down those that may have security-related implications. On issues linked to security, it is essential to foster constructive dialogue to find common ground without undermining national interests. For the Central Government, this is a defining moment. After ruling J&K directly for over five years, the Central leadership has the responsibility to demonstrate that the UT model can be a platform for inclusive growth and effective governance. This requires not only supporting the elected UT leadership but also respecting its autonomy in matters that do not conflict with national security. The Centre’s ability to collaborate with the Omar-led government without imposing political agendas will set a precedent for future UT governance. By focusing on people-centric policies and ensuring that development reaches every corner of J&K, the Centre can reinforce the viability of the UT model as governance in J&K. As J&K embarks on this new chapter, it is imperative that both leaderships rise above political differences to focus on what truly matters: the welfare of the people. If this balance is achieved, the UT model of governance can indeed prove to be better than the state model, setting a benchmark for other regions across India.
(The author is a teacher at Govt Degree College Khansahib, Budgam. The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author and aren’t necessarily in accord with the views of “Kashmir Horizon”)
Dr. Ashraf Zainabi
[email protected]
