B.R. Ambedkar Was the Greatest Opponent of Article 370: Home Minister Amit Shah

New Delhi: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday addressed a press conference at the BJP headquarters, highlighting B.R. Ambedkar’s strong opposition to Article 370, which had accorded special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The Minister’s statement comes amid controversy over his remarks regarding Ambedkar and the Congress party’s historical stance on constitutional values.
At a press conference in New Delhi Home Minister Amit Shah criticized the Congress for its alleged distortion of facts during the parliamentary debate on the 75 years of India’s progress, referred to as the Gaurav Yatra and Vikas Yatra. He emphasized that discussions in democratic forums like Parliament should always be rooted in facts and truth, which he claimed the Congress had failed to uphold.
“The Congress Party has consistently undermined the values of B.R. Ambedkar. From opposing Ambedkar during his lifetime to leaving no stone unturned to defeat him in the elections of 1951-52 and 1954, the Congress has shown its anti-Ambedkar stance,” Shah alleged. He further accused the Congress of being anti-reservation, anti-constitution, and of repeatedly distorting Ambedkar’s legacy for political gain.
Reiterating Ambedkar’s role in opposing Article 370, Shah said, “B.R. Ambedkar was the greatest opponent of Article 370. He believed in the unity and integrity of India.
The Minister also launched a scathing attack on the Congress for its imposition of the Emergency, undermining the judiciary, and “insulting martyrs of the army” by compromising India’s territorial integrity. According to him, these actions reveal a pattern of the Congress prioritizing political expediency over national interest.
“The BJP has always been the true defender of Ambedkar’s legacy while the Congress’s misrepresentation of history has been exposed during the recent parliamentary debate”.
Shah furthermore, condemned the Congress for allegedly attempting to spread misconceptions in society by “dressing the truth in the garb of falsehood.”