Recently new recruitment rules have been framed for the employment of Assistant Professors in higher education department. The selection criterion has been modified to place greater emphasis on written examination, wherein points to academic qualification has been reduced to only 10 marks. The minutes of the meeting are given:
A. Written Examination 75 marks
i) Paper -I: Relevant Subject: 60 Marks
ii) Paper-II: General (Multi disciplinary, General studies, Indian History and Culture, Constitution of India, Ability Enhancement etc.): 15 marks Marks
B. Academic Qualification:10 marks (Criterion As per UGC Regulations)
C. Interview 15 marks
This is the sad story for Ph.D scholars in Jammu and Kashmir. We have been already screened at national level via JRF/NET for eligibility of assistant professor. But the state administration compels us to reappear in exams and adopt the criteria that has been designed and customized to facilitate the backdoor entry of their kins. It takes years of hard work and dedication to complete Ph.D degree and reducing its weightage is a sheer injustice and is going to demoralize researchers. As per UGC criteria, Ph.D is important criterion for the promotion from assistant professor to associate professor both in colleges and universities. The new criteria will facilitate PG level students to get appoint in the higher education department, who then seek study leaves for undertaking Ph.D program which further degrades the quality of education in our colleges and universities. These new recruitment rules are going to affect university education the most. Students won’t opt for research then. In case administration at University of Kashmir believes that this selection criteria will ensure objectivity and transparency (which it will not), then the varsity must shuttle down its research centres so that a simple PG pass out can cram the syllabus and get appointed in higher education. UGC is on the path to make Ph.D as basic eligibility and mandatory qualification for the appointment of Assistant Professors in Universities and Colleges (UGC Amendment Regulations, 2018 and 2021, clause 3.10), but unfortunately it is not the case in Jammu and Kashmir. Bureaucrats mostly lack knowledge about academics and do not even bother to seek expert opinions in this regard prior to framing of such recruitment rules. We simply question them ‘how will a recent PG pass out without any research experience teach and guide at PG level?’ Moreover, NET and SET are national level eligibility tests and framing rule for conducting another test for recruitment is utter non-sense.
“Albert Einstein was refused to provide a professorship/ assistantship. This was a worst case of brilliance being ignored due to evil criteria. The main reason for his rejection was a bad recommendation letter from a professor who didn’t like him.”
Being a stakeholder, I want to seek answersfor few of Questions from policy makers of J&K.
• How u guarantee that the news rules would ensure the quality education at higher education level by excluding highly qualified candidates.
• How you justify to provide just 1 point to JRF and 2.5 marks to Ph. D which takes around 1 decade to qualify and complete it.
• How you justify that your screening will help you to get talentedassistant professorsthan those who got screened by UGC via all India JRF/NET exam.
• If you took a shot of vaccine for COVID-19, then how you justify to exclude the research papers from getting any point which takes years to publish.
• How you justify that your criteria fulfills the demands of New Education Policy.
“Albert Einstein was refused to provide a professorship/ assistantship. This was a worst case of brilliance being ignored due to evil criteria. The main reason for his rejection was a bad recommendation letter from a professor who didn’t like him.”
(The author is Ph.D Scholar , Dept. of Botany, University of Kashmir. Views are his own) [email protected]
