Human rights is an issue of human security. There is broad concern on the human rights that are mentioned in the the United Nations Declaration of 1948, but there is no unanimity on which set of rights should be treated as universal or what should the global community do when rights are violated. This is the one of the most important problem, one can sense in the present era. These are literally moral principles or norms that describe Certain standards of human behaviour and are regularly protected as natural and legal rights in municipal and international law. They are commonly understood as inalienable, fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply beacuse she or he is a human being and which are inherent in all human beings, regardless of their nation, location, language, religion, ethnic origin or other status. They are applicable everywhere and at every time in the sense of being universal, and they are egalitarian in the sense of being the same for everyone. Human rights are regarded as required empathy and tge rule of law and imposing an obligation on persons to respect the human rights of others, and it is generally considered that they should not be taken away expect as a result of due process based on specific circumstances, for example human rights may include for from unlawful imprisonment torture and execution.
Human rights in India is an issue complicated by the country’s large size, and population, widespread poverty, lack of proper education and its diverse culture, even though being the world’s largest sovereign, secular, democratic republic. The constitution of India provides for fundamental rights, which include freedom of religion. Clauses also provide for freedom of speech, as well as seperation of executive and judiciary and freedom of movement within the country and abroad too. It may have different forms in republic of India. But the epicenter is in Kashmir where Kashmir rights are being violated in profusion, and lives of humans hardly matter for anything. Let’s not deny the fact, that India is asking for a permanent seat in UNSC. But to achieve such landmark, it has to stop such things which can prove too disastrous for it the global affairs. In Kashmir human rights are violated in such a way, that humans are not even uttering a word, and international organization like UNO remains to be a mute spectator. This sort of disease should be in the hall of fame of man-made one, beacuse for stifle the voices of the common people of Kashmir India is crossing every limit of it, it can prove very dangerous in the very near future. People have got evert type of freedom within the four walls of the constitution, but that entity of constitution seems to on preamble only, no practicability at all in Kashmir.
Israeli action in Palestine, like Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, Genocide in Rwanda and killing of people in East Timor by Indonesian army since long time, India’s militarily atrocities in Kashmir has led to the debate if the UN is empowered to restrict human rights abuses or not. The idealists argue that UN Charter empowers the UN to take action against resorting to human rights violations. But the realists counter this argument by arguing that only the national interests of powerful and big states would determine whether UN action can be or cannot be initiated in human rights violation.